You Might AlsoLike
Nigeria is at a pivotal juncture in its quest for sustainable industrialization. Despite abundant natural resource endowment, it has historically struggled to leverage these assets to catalyze robust economic growth and development. The Export Expansion Grant (EEG), introduced in 2002, emerged as a strategic response to this economic dilemma. By 2015, the EEG had supported exports worth approximately $3.5 billion, spanning sectors like agriculture, solid minerals, and manufactured goods. Between 2010 and 2020, Nigeria’s non-oil exports witnessed a remarkable expansion, growing from $1.5 billion to over $10 billion.
Regardless of this noteworthy macroeconomic impact, the implementation of the EEG is replete with devastating structural weaknesses. A 2018 World Bank report highlighted that between 2010 and 2018, over 70% of EEG benefits were concentrated in raw material and minimally processed commodity exports, directly contradicting the program’s original industrialization objectives. Firms exporting agricultural products and solid minerals in their natural forms receive substantial grants most of the time without any investment in local processing capabilities.
Join Us for the
Africa Raw Materials Summit 2025
Unarguably, however, sustainable economic development requires more than mere export promotion. It necessitates a holistic approach integrating export incentives, local value addition, technological capacity building, and strategic industrial policy. The EEG implementation ignores this desideratum, aggravating Nigeria’s dilemma and the bane of its low levels of industrialization, which has roots in raw materials export without value addition. Between 2010 and 2020, Nigeria exported approximately $400 billion of raw materials, while manufactured goods represented less than 5% of total exports.
The legislative push for a 30% value addition requirement on raw materials before export is a strategic move to transform Nigeria’s reliance on raw material exports into a more diversified economy that promotes industrialization and job creation. This approach is not without precedence. Countries like Indonesia and Malaysia have implemented similar policies in their palm oil industries, resulting in significant economic benefits and enhanced local manufacturing capacities. For instance, after implementing a ban on exporting unprocessed minerals in 2014, Indonesia saw a substantial increase in domestic processing facilities, which added value locally and created jobs.
Comparative international experiences provide instructive insights. Malaysia’s transformation from a raw material exporter to a manufacturing powerhouse offers a compelling model. Through strategic policies like the National Development Policy (1991), Malaysia implemented targeted interventions that mandated local value addition, particularly in the palm oil and rubber industries. By 2020, Malaysia’s manufactured exports had grown to over 80% of total exports, compared to Nigeria’s mere 10%.
Similarly, Indonesia’s 2014 regulation banning raw nickel ore exports serves as a particularly instructive example. Within five years of implementation, Indonesia’s processed nickel exports surged from $2.1 billion to $12.7 billion annually. The policy led to the establishment of 13 new smelters, creating over 87,000 direct jobs and contributing an additional 3.2% to Indonesia’s GDP. By 2021, Indonesia had transformed from a raw ore exporter to the world’s largest producer of refined nickel, commanding 30% of global market share.
Ghana’s cocoa sector transformation provides another compelling example. Following the 2011 policy requiring 60% domestic processing of cocoa before export, Ghana’s processed cocoa exports increased from $1.2 billion in 2010 to $3.5 billion by 2019. The country established eight new processing facilities, creating approximately 35,000 direct jobs and 100,000 indirect employment opportunities in associated industries. While raw cocoa beans fetch roughly $2,500 per metric ton on the global market, processed cocoa products such as cocoa butter or powder command prices up to four times higher. Nigeria, the world’s fourth-largest cocoa producer, loses an estimated $1 billion annually due to inadequate investment in local processing, according to the Cocoa Processors Association of Nigeria (COPAN).
The Export Expansion Grant (EEG) scheme, while designed to stimulate non-oil exports in Nigeria, substantially hampers the country’s broader industrialization objectives. By offering incentives for the export of raw materials, the EEG inadvertently prioritizes the quick revenue of unprocessed goods over the long-term value addition that industrialization demands. In 2022 alone, raw cocoa exports contributed over $500 million to the economy. However, processed cocoa products, such as chocolate and cocoa powder, contributed far less despite having exponentially higher value on international markets. This preference for raw material export, bolstered by EEG incentives, discourages investments in local processing facilities, critical for job creation and technology transfer, thereby stifling economic diversification.
A compelling illustration of this dynamic is lucid in the agricultural sector. Take the case of Nigeria’s cashew industry: the EEG scheme has made it more lucrative for exporters to ship raw cashew nuts to countries like Vietnam and India, where they are processed and re-exported at significantly higher prices. This reliance on raw cashew export has undercut the domestic cashew processing industry, which operates at less than 20% of its capacity. In contrast, countries like Ghana, which emphasizes local processing through targeted subsidies and export restrictions on raw materials, have successfully developed thriving agro-industrial hubs. The hypothetical scenario of Nigeria adopting a similar approach shows the potential for over 500,000 direct and indirect jobs in the cashew value chain. Yet, the current EEG framework incentivizes raw exports, with a significant counterproductive impact on industrial growth.
This misalignment with industrialization goals undermines Nigeria’s ambition to establish a self-reliant and robust industrial base. A thriving industrial sector depends on the ability to process raw materials into finished goods locally, thereby capturing a more significant share of the value chain. However, the EEG’s focus on raw material export perpetuates a dependency on external markets for value addition, limiting the development of domestic industries and reducing economic resilience. Furthermore, this approach exacerbates trade imbalances by compelling Nigeria to import processed goods derived from raw materials at significantly higher costs. Nigeria risks remaining locked in a colonial-era economic structure that prioritizes resource extraction over sustainable industrialization without recalibrating the EEG to prioritize incentives for value-added exports.
The lack of focus on value addition has a devastating impact on local employment and skill development. Processing industries typically generate higher employment levels and contribute to skill enhancement than speculative economic gains from raw material exports. A case in point is the cashew industry, where a fully operational processing sector could create an estimated 300,000 direct jobs and countless indirect opportunities in ancillary services such as logistics and packaging. However, with over 90% of Nigeria’s cashew exports being raw nuts, domestic processing plants remain underutilized, leading to job losses and a failure to develop technical expertise.
The long-term effect on Nigeria’s trade balance and economic sustainability is equally concerning. Dependence on raw material exports creates vulnerability to global price fluctuations and diminishes the country’s ability to leverage favourable trade terms. In 2022, Nigeria’s trade deficit widened to over $20 billion, exacerbated by high imports of processed goods like refined petroleum, textiles, and food products—many of which we can produce domestically. Furthermore, relying on raw material exports reinforces structural imbalances, perpetuating a cycle of low-value exports and high-value imports. Without redirecting the EEG toward encouraging value addition, Nigeria risks depleting its natural resources while failing to achieve the economic transformation necessary for long-term sustainability.
Nigeria must prioritize value-added exports over raw material shipments driven by the Export Expansion Grant (EEG) as a critical realignment for achieving its industrialization goals. This shift requires restructuring the incentive framework to reward exporters who process raw materials locally. An excellent example is a tiered incentive structure offering higher grants for finished goods such as processed cocoa, textiles, or machinery and reduced benefits for raw exports. Countries like Malaysia, which transitioned from raw palm oil exports to dominating the global market in refined palm oil and oleochemicals, demonstrate the transformative potential of such policies. By tying EEG benefits to investments in local industries, Nigeria could create a more balanced and sustainable export economy, fostering long-term growth.
Driving Nigeria’s industrialization demands bold, targeted policies that enforce a minimum 30% value addition to raw materials before export. This mandate would spur local processing and align with successful global benchmarks in Malaysia and Indonesia. These nations revolutionized their palm oil and mineral industries by adopting similar strategies, significantly enhancing their domestic manufacturing capacities. Beyond this, Nigeria must introduce robust incentives, including tax holidays, targeted subsidies, and access to affordable energy, to encourage investment in processing facilities. Establishing a dedicated oversight body to monitor the Export Expansion Grant (EEG) is critical. Such a body would assess compliance with value-addition mandates and track the grant’s impact on industrial development, offering data-driven insights to refine policy directions and ensure alignment with national priorities.
Join Us for the
Africa Raw Materials Summit 2025
Nigeria can enhance the EEG’s effectiveness and accountability by incorporating comprehensive monitoring and evaluation systems. A well-structured evaluation framework would provide feedback loops to adjust industrial policies dynamically, ensuring they remain relevant and impactful. This model would also strengthen the collaboration between government and private sector stakeholders, ensuring that industries benefit from the EEG while contributing to broader economic objectives. A shift in focus from raw material exports to value-added goods would transform Nigeria’s economic trajectory, encouraging sustainable growth and fostering global competitiveness.
Ultimately, repositioning the EEG is pivotal to Nigeria’s industrial future. A recalibrated framework that prioritizes local value addition, incentivizes industrial investment and enforces strategic oversight can reverse the counterproductive tendencies of the current system. Inspirations from global success stories should encourage the country to harness its vast natural resources to drive long-term economic transformation, create jobs, and advance technological innovation. This strategic shift will reduce Nigeria’s reliance on external markets while positioning it as a competitive manufacturing hub on the global stage. We can reimagine the EEG as a cornerstone of sustainable economic growth and industrialization through policies that reward value-added processing, enhance industrial capacity, and integrate effective monitoring mechanisms.
